Why is socialism so popular?
Why do Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren attract such large crowds, especially of young people, to hear their economic nostrums? (We are talking here of coercive socialism, not the voluntary variety of the kibbutz or the commune.)
One answer is that Hollywood is a preserve of the left, as are the universities, the pulpit, the major media. Elementary school teachers drum these schemes into their charges and this continues unabated into the high schools and beyond.
This goes a long way toward explaining the popularity of socialism, but how do we account for this state of the world in the first place?
Milton Friedman once blamed the war in Vietnam for this sad state of affairs.
Young leftists took advantage of the university deferment from the draft; rightists fought abroad. The former subsequently took over the campus. This has undoubted explanatory power, but how did the future academic radicals initially attain their viewpoints?
This might explain the sad state of academia, but what of the rest of the culture?
We have to dig deeper. One possible explanation stems from biology: We are hardwired to be socialists, except for the few of us who are in effect mutants. Say what?
This account is based on the fact that eons ago, when our grandparents were in the caves, we lived in groups of only a few dozen, most of whom were relatives.
If a man came back from the hunt with a deer and didn’t share it, he was booted out of the tribe and tended to leave fewer progeny than would otherwise have been the case. Egalitarianism springs from such a source.
In Tribe A, if someone was sick this week, you helped him. Next week, you were ill, and he reciprocated. Tribe B had no such practices. We stem from the former, not the latter. Hence we for the most part tend in the direction of being amiable with one another. This is the source of benevolence.
But whence sprang our instinctive predilection toward free enterprise? We also have some of that, but it is far weaker. Few of our ancestors engaged in what Adam Smith called “bartering and trucking.”
Markets, where people dealt with others in an arm’s length manner, came far later in human history. Cordiality, then, is far more deeply embedded in most of us than profit-seeking is. Many of us missed out when they were handing out the “gene” for appreciating the “invisible hand.”
This is why most people recoil in disgust at markets in used body parts. The thought of selling a part of yourself is loathsome. Our biology calls for us to donate kidneys for free. That is the decent thing to do.
As a result, at a zero price control, some 80,000 Americans are condemned to kidney dialysis machines, and many of them die before their time. Were supply allowed to be equated with demand, via a free price system, such tragedies could be avoided.
“Obscene” profits are reviled. Gordon Gekko opined that “greed is good,” but our hardwiring recoils at any such insight. Ditto for profiteering, price gouging and all the rest. It is difficult to overcome biological hardwiring.
We still have free will. Our tendency to distrust the free enterprise system can indeed be overcome. But trying to convince people of the benefits of laissez-faire capitalism goes against the grain of many, especially the youth.
According to that old adage: “If a person is not a socialist at 20 years of age, he has no heart; if he still supports socialism at 50, he has no brain.”
Maybe there is still hope for us. Our present generation of young socialists will one day grow up.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.