Commentary

Watch: Monica Lewinsky Storms Off Stage After 'Off Limits' Question Asked

After giving a speech in Jerusalem, Monica Lewinsky had an interview with Israeli news anchor Yonit Levi which she cut short after being asked about former President Bill Clinton‘s recent comments regarding his scandal with Lewinsky.

“Recently in an interview with NBC News, former President Bill Clinton was rather irate when he was asked if he had ever apologized to you personally, and he said he apologized to you publicly. Do you still expect a personal apology?” Levi asked according to The Daily Caller.

“I’m sorry, I’m not going to be able to do this,” Lewinsky said before walking off.

Lewinsky claimed that the question about Clinton’s interview was “off limits” in a recent Twitter statement.

Trending:
Entitled Woman Assaults McDonald's Employees for Refusing Her Special Request, They Fight Back and She Ends Up Leaving in Handcuffs

“There were clear parameters about what we would be discussing and what we would not. In fact, the exact question the interviewer asked first, she had put to me when we met the day prior. I said that was off limits,” Lewinsky said.

Lewinsky apologized to the audience, which had reacted with both confused murmurs and some applause after she walked away from the interview. However, Lewinsky’s statement did not make the situation any less confusing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv9qr358GXA

Instead of disputing Lewinsky’s version at first, the news outlet took the diplomatic route, thanking Lewinsky and adding that they “respect her sensitivity and wish her luck,” according to The Jerusalem Post.

Do you think Bill Clinton still owes Monica Lewinsky an apology?

However, the outlet later disputed Lewinsky’s claim, saying “the question that was asked was legitimate, worthy and respectful, and in no way went beyond Ms. Lewinsky’s requests.”

Levi’s question referred to the NBC News interview in which Clinton was asked if he would have reacted to the scandal differently in light of the #MeToo movement.

“Because people would be using the facts instead of the imagined facts. If the facts were the same today, I wouldn’t,” Clinton said.

Clinton also defended his decision to fight impeachment.

“I think I did the right thing. I defended the Constitution,” Clinton claimed.

Related:
Conservatives Fighting Back in the Culture War: The Daily Wire Announces New Film 'Run Hide Fight'

It is unclear if this situation occurred because of a misunderstanding or if one party is not telling the whole truth. I can understand why any journalist would want to ask the question. Clinton’s extramarital affair had significant political consequences at the time.

On the other hand, Monica Lewinsky is essentially a celebrity, and she’s famous for exactly one thing — which is likely one of the moments in her life of which she is least proud. Her wanting to put that behind her — especially after more than two decades — is equally understandable.

Either way, if Lewinsky’s intention is to distance herself from her past affair with Clinton, she obviously still has a lot of work to do.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Malachi Bailey is a writer from Ohio with a background in history, education and philosophy. He has led multiple conservative groups and is dedicated to the principles of free speech, privacy and peace.
Malachi Bailey is a writer from Ohio with a passion for free speech, privacy and peace. He graduated from the College of Wooster with a B.A. in History. While at Wooster, he served as the Treasurer for the Wooster Conservatives and the Vice President for the Young Americans for Liberty.
Topics of Expertise
Politics, History




loading

Conversation