They are towering figures, larger-than-life statues that honor heroes of a bygone era.
The Confederate leaders memorialized on Monument Avenue in Richmond, Virginia, were once revered, but have become flashpoints in a national debate about how symbols of slavery and white supremacy should be treated today.
The angst over what to do with Confederate monuments has been particularly pronounced in Richmond, onetime capital of the Confederacy.
Local artists hope a new exhibit will spark ideas about how to accurately document the city’s history while not glorifying Confederate leaders.
“How do you honor that history of the street while at the same time trying to engage people who come to Richmond and the residents who live here in a meaningful conversation about what they mean today?” said Bill Martin, director of The Valentine museum, where renderings of 20 creative proposals for redesigning the street are now on display.
The exhibit grew out of an international design competition that asked architects, planners, designers and artists to reimagine Monument Avenue, a five-mile historic urban boulevard where five giant statues of Confederate figures from Virginia stand, including Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, J.E.B. Stuart, Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and Confederate Naval commander Matthew Fontaine Maury.
The contest drew 70 entries from around the world.
“Monument Avenue: General Demotion/General Devotion” features the designs chosen as finalists.
The proposals, depicted on oversized placards, range from elaborate to humorous.
One suggests burying the statues underground and leaving only the heads visible, a design that would eliminate some of the grandeur of the current statues and allow people to see the figures at eye-level or look at them in an underground viewing area.
Another depicts the J.E.B. Stuart statue as a garden where overgrown native plants cover Stuart. The Stonewall Jackson statue is shown covered in books — a “temporary-interactive dumping ground” where people can drop off textbooks that depict slavery as a benign institution.
Still, another calls for replacing all the Confederate statues with light-filled sculptures and pavilions and creating new monuments to commemorate major milestones in the civil rights movement.
Organizers acknowledge that none of the proposals will likely be used as a precise blueprint for what to do with the statues. But they are hoping that some of the ideas will spark conversations that could lead to a resolution.
The national debate over Civil War symbols erupted in 2015 after white supremacist Dylann Roof fatally shot nine black people at a South Carolina church. It was reignited in 2017 following a deadly white nationalist protest in Charlottesville.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which has tracked the movement, estimates that 114 Confederate symbols around the country have been removed or renamed since 2015, but another 1,747 remain undisturbed.
“I think, and our report makes clear, that the monuments are about white supremacy and they do invite very difficult conversations about our nation’s past that some people would rather not have,” said Seth Levi, the lead researcher on the center’s 2018 report chronicling the Confederate symbols that have been removed and those that remain in place.
In Richmond, a commission has recommended removing the statue of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, adding historical context to the other statues and erecting new monuments to reflect a more complete story of the city’s history.
The Valentine exhibit opened last month, two weeks after a scandal over a racist yearbook photo and an admission of wearing blackface prompted calls for Gov. Ralph Northam to resign. Northam refused to step down and has promised to use his last three years in office to work toward racial reconciliation.
Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney appointed members of a new group — the Richmond History and Culture Commission — to evaluate the city’s historical sites and provide guidance on the fate of the Monument Avenue statues.
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.