Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer remains undecided about retirement plans, saying in an interview published Friday that there are “many considerations” playing a part in his eventual decision.
“There are a lot of blurred things here, and there are many considerations,” Breyer told The New York Times.
“They form a whole. I’ll make a decision.”
Despite Breyer’s statements, he acknowledges the involvement of politics in his retirement decision.
Breyer stated that achieving his preferred political outcomes “will inevitably be in the psychology” of his final decision.
This resolution stems from late-Justice Antonin Scalia’s words.
“[Scalia] said, ‘I don’t want somebody appointed who will just reverse everything I’ve done for the last 25 years,’” Breyer recalled.
Breyer, nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1994, said he wanted to retire before death, unlike Scalia and the late-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
“I don’t think I’m going to stay there till I die — hope not,” Breyer said.
He also expressed wariness of proposals to expand the court “to overcome what is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority,” warning those in favor to “think twice, at least.”
Breyer warned that expanding the court risks undercutting “public faith in the court” and imperiling “the rule of law.”
“If A can do it, B can do it. And what are you going to have when you have A and B doing it?” Breyer asked.
“Nobody really knows, but there’s a risk, and how big a risk do you want to take?”
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.
For licensing opportunities of the DCNF’s original content, please contact email@example.com.
A version of this article appeared on the Daily Caller News Foundation website.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.