Share
Commentary

Biden's Name on List in Flynn's Case Makes That 'GMA' Interview Look Even Worse Than It Was

Share

Joe Biden wasn’t very convincing on Tuesday when it came to a question about the Obama administration’s efforts to snare Michael Flynn

On Wednesday, it got a lot worse.

It turns out, the former vice president was on the list of Obama administration officials who’d sought information about the FBI’s investigation of Flynn as President Donald Trump’s pick for national security advisor was about to take office in January 2017.

And that makes Biden’s response to a direct question from ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on Tuesday look like the words of a liar — or a fool. Neither is a good look for a man seeking the trust of the American people.

According to Fox News, Biden’s name was among top members of the Obama administration who made requests to “unmask” Flynn’s identity after his calls were picked up as part of normal surveillance of communications by then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Trending:
Cutter Spots Chinese Fleet Near Americas, Third Officer Looks at Radar and Instantly Sees the Red Flags

CBS News’ Catherine Herridge published the list in a Twitter post.

As summarized in a Washington Examiner report from April 2017, “masking” refers to the process American intelligence agencies use to protect the identities of American citizens whose innocent communications are picked up as part of surveillance activities.

Do you think news like this will hurt Joe Biden with average Americans?

A private citizen — as the retired three-star Gen. Flynn was before the Trump administration took office — would be identified by a number if he were picked in a conversation with a foreign surveillance target.

The true names of the individuals involved could only be released to those authorized to ask for the information — including, in this case, the man who was vice president of the United States.

Other names on Herridge’s list include then-FBI Director James Comey — surprise, surprise — then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and then-President Barack Obama’s chief of staff Denis McDonough. In short, it was a rogue’s gallery of anti-Trump activists. (And who do you think ended up with the information McDonough wanted?)

So, Biden might well have been authorized to “unmask” Flynn’s identity as a party to a conversation involving the Russian ambassador to the U.S. in 2017. His problem is that it makes what he said to Stephanopoulos look even shakier than it did on Tuesday.

During that interview, Stephanopoulos very clearly asked Biden what he knew about the investigation into Flynn.

Related:
The True Cost of Biden's Legislative Agenda Is Worse Than We Could Have Ever Imagined: Study

Biden at first responded categorically — “I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn” — before launching into a tangent about how the whole thing was a distraction from the country’s real problems.

When Stephanopoulos insisted, noting that Biden was known to be present at a Jan. 5, 2017, White House meeting where Flynn was one of the main topics of conversation, Biden changed his tune and claimed he misunderstood the question.

“I was aware that they had asked for an investigation, but that’s all I know about it. And I don’t think anything else,” he said.

Well, either Biden or someone in his office apparently knew much more about it than that.

The list of those seeking to “umask” Flynn was declassified by acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell. According to Fox, Grenell wrote in a document accompanying the list that each one “was an authorized recipient of the original report and the unmasking was approved through NSA’s standard process, which includes a review of the justification for the request.”

However, Grenell added that: “While the principals are identified below, we cannot confirm they saw the unmasked information. This response does not include any requests outside of the specified time-frame.”

So, Biden was either not telling the truth about knowing only that “they had asked for an investigation,” or his office was seeking surveillance information about an American citizen without Biden being aware of it — which paints Biden as exactly the kind of doddering figurehead he looks like.

And it’s exactly the kind of image Democrats are trying to shake for their pathetic presumptive candidate in the run-up to the presidential election.

Some social media responses showed how hard that’s going to be:

Regrettably, but not surprisingly, there were quite a few responses to Herridge’s Twitter post that defended the “unmasking” because the 16 requests that were honored were from individuals authorized to make them.

That might be technically true. But even a liberal has to know about the growing body of evidence and developments indicated Flynn was targeted for an unjust prosecution. It’s why the Justice Department moved to dismiss the criminal charge against him last week.

More to the point, the list is written proof that the presumptive Democratic nominee for the presidency either has no problem lying directly to the American people in a television interview (a la Bill “I did not have sex with that woman” Clinton) or doesn’t know what’s happening in his own domain.

The Trump campaign wasted no time in pointing out how pitiful this looks.

“Joe Biden’s limp claim that he doesn’t know anything about the railroading of Gen. Michael Flynn just got even more unbelievable. Biden is listed among the Obama administration officials who requested the unmasking of Flynn,” campaign manager Brad Parscale said in a statement, according to Fox. “We already knew Biden was briefed on the Flynn case before President Trump took office and now we know that he wanted Flynn unmasked.”

“Americans have a right to know the depth of Biden’s involvement in the setup of Gen. Flynn to further the Russia collusion hoax.”

The Biden campaign put out a statement as well, though it did nothing beyond seeking to blame Republicans and blasting Flynn instead of explaining the then-vice president’s actions.

Biden’s going to have to do better than that before November, unless he wants to think he’s either a liar or a fool.

It’s a good bet he’s both.

And the way things are going, the American people are going to find it out.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,
Share
Joe has spent more than 30 years as a reporter, copy editor and metro desk editor in newsrooms in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Florida. He's been with Liftable Media since 2015.
Joe has spent more than 30 years as a reporter, copy editor and metro editor in newsrooms in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Florida. He's been with Liftable Media since 2015. Largely a product of Catholic schools, who discovered Ayn Rand in college, Joe is a lifelong newspaperman who learned enough about the trade to be skeptical of every word ever written. He was also lucky enough to have a job that didn't need a printing press to do it.
Birthplace
Philadelphia
Nationality
American




loading

Conversation