Clueless Dem Voices Support for Law Written by Opponent in Failed Attempt To Bash Her

Combined Shape

Every election cycle, it happens with the regularity of the swallows returning to San Juan Capistrano: Party officials identify some great white whale of the opposition they believe they have an outside chance of harpooning and, with the monomania of a thousand wonk Captain Ahabs, pursue the dream of scoring the ultimate upset.

Thank heavens for this class of upstart candidates and the support that coalesces around them, by the way — at least if they’re Democrats.

Not only is the fawning coverage given to them by the media revealing, but the candidates are often a sinkhole into which millions upon millions of dollars that could have been better used elsewhere are constantly shoveled into.

We’ve seen it this year, as Democrat Amy McGrath takes on Senate Majority Mitch McConnell of Kentucky in a bid that’s likely doomed to fail.

And we saw it in 2018, when sweaty huckster Beto O’Rourke challenged Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz. O’Rourke received a Brobdingnagian amount of campaign cash and was called a “rock star” by an ABC News correspondent before losing quite predictably — and, in the process, essentially taking money that could have gone to viable candidates and lighting it on fire.

Report: Bidens Aggressively Dodged More Than $500,000 in Taxes Before Joe Demanded Americans Pay Their 'Fair Share'

In 2020, one of the big-name incumbent Republicans who Democrats are targeting is Rep. Elise Stefanik. The New York Republican, who took office following the landslide Republican midterm victories of 2014, gained new prominence amid the Trump impeachment process as a steadfast and erudite defender of the president — and one who liked a good troll, to boot.

The chief Captain Ahab in this case is Tedra Cobb, a business consultant who served in her country’s legislature for two terms, according to Ballotpedia. Not exactly the kind of person who you might think would knock off a featured speaker on night three of the Republican National Convention, and even the Albany Times Union — in a Stefanik-bashing editorial which declared her vulnerable — noted that Cobb winning, “though hardly impossible, still seems unlikely.”

So you’re saying there’s a chance. Anyhow, Cobb’s probably going to be handicapped by self-owns like her campaign’s policy positions on the military.

In the laundry list of the ways in which Cobb implies she would be different than Stefanik, she says that she will “[s]upport legislation such as the Military Family Stability Act, which provides flexible timing when moving for new assignments.”

In a tweet Tuesday morning, Cobb directed voters to her plan, saying: “Stefanik has turned a blind eye to the bounties put on American soldiers. Supporting military service members and Veterans cannot just be a political talking point.”

It shouldn’t be a political talking point, no.

However, it’s interesting to note that the Military Family Stability Act is already law, having been signed in December 2017.

I’m disappointed that Rep. Stefanik voted against it, given she’s voiced support for families in our armed forces. It shouldn’t be enough for you to change your vote to Cobb, but Stefanik’s refusal to support the bill is, quite frankly, a disapp–

'New George Soros' Dished Out Millions to Group That Lobbied for Democrat Causes, Including HR 1 Election Bill

Oh wait, she sponsored the House version of the bill. Never mind, then.

“As the home of Fort Drum and the Kesselring Navy nuclear site, our district knows firsthand the critical role military families play in supporting our troops and providing for our national defense,” Stefanik said in a statement upon introducing the bill in January 2017.

Should Cobb apologize for appropriating her opponent's legislation?

“Military families make great sacrifices when relocating and transitioning to new schools, jobs and communities, and we must do all we can to help ease their burden. Military families serve too, and I am proud to introduce these commonsense measures to support these patriots.”

When Stefanik called out Cobb for essentially plagiarizing a bill she wrote, claiming to support it (even though it’s law) and refusing to credit her, Jerry Moore — editorial page director at the Watertown Daily Times — politely and wrongly mansplained to Stefanik why her anger was uncalled for.

The controversy is that it’s still on there, despite the fact that Cobb gave no credit to Stefanik or informed voters it was law.

As for “more than 2 years ago,” Stefanik introduced this more than three years ago, in January 2017. It’s already law. Is Cobb giving Stefanik credit? Of course not — by including it on her laundry list of campaign goals, she’s implying the person who authored the legislation is actually against it.

It’s worth noting that once upon a time — nine months ago, to be exact, back when we were in the midst of impeachment — Stefanik’s defense of President Donald Trump made her a popular fundraising money pit, thanks in part to promotion from The Lincoln Project’s George Conway:

While Conway is no longer with The Lincoln Project because of familial issues, it’s worth pointing that this is a group of people who claim to want to restore dignity to politics by “saving” the GOP, yet here’s Conway fundraising for Cobb by calling Stefanik “lying trash.”

Cobb would only end up raising $2 million during that quarter, but the cause shall endure and the dream shall never die:

Agreed. Now is as good a time as any to set those greenbacks aflame.

Don’t just do it for me, though.

Do it for Beto O’Rourke. Do it for Amy McGrath. And most importantly, do it so your money doesn’t go to anyone who has a chance of winning.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , , , ,
Combined Shape
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014.
C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal since 2014. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).
Morristown, New Jersey
Catholic University of America
Languages Spoken
English, Spanish
Topics of Expertise
American Politics, World Politics, Culture