Elder: There's 1 Inconvenient Fact in Between Trump and the 'Insurrectionist' Label Dems Want for Him


In an editorial called “Trump’s silence on Jan. 6 is damning,” the New York Post wrote, “His only focus was to find any means — damn the consequences — to block the peaceful transfer of power. There is no other explanation, just as there is no defense, for his refusal to stop the violence.

“It’s up to the Justice Department to decide if this is a crime. But as a matter of principle, as a matter of character, Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again.”

I disagree.

Former President Donald Trump felt robbed, and understandably so. Let’s look at just three states.

The Michigan secretary of state used COVID-19 as an excuse to send a mail-in ballot application to every registered voter, whether or not the voter requested one.

Tragedy Strikes CEO and His Family During Thanksgiving Travel - Only One Survivor Made It Out of Their Car

True, Trump lost his lawsuit against Michigan when the state Supreme Court refused to take up the case, leaving an appeals court ruling in place. But in that 2-1 ruling on procedural grounds, Judge Patrick Meter dissented, arguing that the “issues are not moot because state electors have not yet been seated, the Electoral College has not yet been assembled, and Congress has not yet convened.”

In Pennsylvania, numerous rules and regulations were violated, allowing election officials to accept some ballots received after Election Day. Two prominent liberal professors, Harvard’s Alan Dershowitz and George Washington University’s Jonathan Turley, suggested that Trump’s lawsuit against the state had merit.

About Pennsylvania’s acceptance of ballots after Election Day, Dershowitz said, “The Constitution doesn’t permit anybody in the state but the legislature to make decisions about elections.” Turley wrote, “Pennsylvania remains a rich environment for challenges. … There are lawsuits over officials ‘curing’ defective ballots and letting ineligible voters fill out ballots, actions that could knock out small pockets which could change the results.”

The Wisconsin Supreme Court, also on procedural grounds, ruled against Trump 4-3. But the chief justice of that court, in a dissent, argued among other things that the use of drop boxes violated the law. Indeed, the court recently disallowed the use of drop boxes except those placed at election offices where only the actual voters can drop off their own ballots.

Did Trump foment an insurrection?

As to fomenting an “insurrection,” Kash Patel, then-chief of staff for the acting secretary of defense, said that on Jan. 4, 2021, “Mr. Trump unequivocally authorized up to 20,000 National Guardsmen and women for us to utilize should … the request come in. But those requests never did.” Patel says he testified under oath to the Jan. 6 committee that he was in the room when Trump made this authorization.

What part of “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” — as Trump said in his Jan. 6 speech — do the Jan. 6 committee members not understand? Yes, the speech ended with, “We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” But politicians have long used rhetoric like “We’re going to fight” or “We’re going to take back America” or “This is war.”

Trump made unsuccessful legal arguments against the certification of the election, as did congressional Democrats following the presidential elections of 2000, 2004 and 2016. But when they did so, the establishment media did not characterize them as “undermining our democracy.”


The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, ,