Share
Commentary

Ford Co-Authored Paper Pushing Hypnosis, Using To Enhance Memory

Share

Trauma is a terrible thing. It can be devastating and its effects should never be played down in the public mind.

However the phenomena of introducing false memories, or manipulating memories of those who have experienced trauma, is a subject that has been treated with kid gloves in the mental health field for decades.

Fast forward to present day and the Senate Judiciary Committee’s increasingly ugly confirmation process for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. The news cycle has focused on nothing else but Christine Blasey Ford and her accusations that a young Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a party during their high school years.

That’s how she remembers it, or so she said to Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

CNN reported her testimony: “Ford’s voice sometimes trembled as she recalled how Kavanaugh and his friend, Mark Judge, shoved her into a bedroom at a high school party when she was 15, and Kavanaugh held her down on the bed as he attempted to remove her clothing. She described her terror when Kavanaugh clapped his hand over her mouth as she tried to scream—a moment where she said it was so hard to breathe that she thought he might accidentally kill her.”

Trending:
FAA Makes Massive Mistake, Accidentally Exposes 704 Previously Unknown Epstein Flights

“Faced with Kavanaugh’s unequivocal denial that the incident occurred, Ford was pressed on whether she was absolutely sure that Kavanaugh was her assailant. ‘100 percent’ she replied.”

There has been a lot of speculation that Ford may be lying, or just not accurately remembering the account of the evening 36 years ago. And maybe with good reason.

Would it be more than fair to speculate that Ford was manufacturing this memory? Even according to her own research, I would dare say it is.

Ford is a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University in California and a research psychologist at Stanford University. She’s certainly affiliated with some pretty prestigious academic credentials.

So maybe it’s also fair to give a second look to a paper she has co-authored on the effects of various therapies on depression.

Why? Because she discusses within the paper how to retrieve memories and create artificial situations.

In the paper titled, “Meditation With Yoga, Group Therapy With Hypnosis, And Psycho-education For Long Term Depressed Mood,” Ford and her co-authors wrote: “Hypnosis has also been widely and successfully used to treat a variety of conditions, including stress, anxiety and psychological aspects of pain. Hypnosis is a form of highly focused attention with a relative constriction of peripheral awareness and has been used successfully as an adjunct to therapy for depression. In 1964, Abrams suggested that hypnosis could be used to improve rapport in the therapeutic relationship, assist in the retrieval of important memories, and create artificial situations that would permit the client to express ego-dystonic emotions in a safe manner.”

Here’s a screen shot of that paragraph touting the benefits of hypnosis and the “retrieval of important memories”:

Related:
No Friends Left: Even the Dems Say the Trump-Hating Lincoln Project Shouldn't Exist

 

And here’s a screen shot of a passage about self-hypnosis:

The left isn’t gong to like this, but in 1997 The New York Times published the findings of a study that found hypnosis could cause false memories:

“HYPNOSIS, even self-hypnosis, can sometimes result in the creation of false memories — the belief that something happened even though it never did. A psychologist at Ohio State University in Lima and fellow researchers found that even when people were warned about the possibility of acquiring pseudo-memories under hypnosis, more than a quarter of them did anyway.”

And in 2012, Psychology Today said pretty much the same thing:

“To be fair, Dr. Loftus also pointed out that Hillary Clinton was guilty of a similar memory malfunction when, during the 2008 presidential campaign, she described a visit to Bosnia during the civil war when she faced enemy snipers. Based on the recollections of the others who went with her to Bosnia (including her daughter, Chelsea), none of her vivid recollections of ducking gunfire actually happened. Confronted with this evidence, Senator Clinton denied lying about the incident. Clinton said, “I made a mistake. I had a different memory. That proves I’m human which  for some people is a revelation.”

Could Ford have experimented with these techniques in a therapy setting at some earlier point in her life?

Do you think Christine Blasey Ford is manufacturing a memory of her alleged attack by Brett Kavanaugh?

We may never know the answer to that question, but there is certainly more than enough counter testimony out there to refute her claims thats a young Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in high school — starting with the fact that none of the witnesses she’s named remember the incident the way she does.

Conservative Tribune reported that Rachel Mitchell, the sex crimes prosecutor who questioned Ford, found her not at all credible. Ford’s memories, or lack thereof, didn’t serve her well as she tried to portray herself as a credible witness.

“In a memo released late Sunday, Rachel Mitchell questioned Ford’s version of events, including the shifting timeline of when the attack occurred, Ford’s inability to remember how she got home, the ambiguity of her willingness to remain anonymous, and the failure of other witnesses to back up her story.”

As time goes by, this story gets weaker and weaker. Isn’t it just too bad that Democrats don’t realize how they’re galvanizing their political opponents with their smear efforts.

They should be embarrassed at the way they have pushed this woman into the spotlight for their own selfish gains.

If  Ford truly suffers from depression or trauma they are abusing her. If she doesn’t then it’s very possible she’s just lying, or brutally, badly mistaken.

None of those answers is good for the left. But the truth rarely is.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share
An enthusiastic grassroots Tea Party activist, Lisa Payne-Naeger has spent the better part of the last decade lobbying for educational and family issues in her state legislature, and as a keyboard warrior hoping to help along the revolution that empowers the people to retake control of their, out-of-control, government.
Lisa Payne-Naeger is passionate about all things related to influencing the configuration of our culture … family, education, politics. She’s a former school board member, turned homeschooling mom. In her quest to raise and educate her now-adult children, she has pretty much navigated every challenge and road block possible. Crusading to make the world a better place for them has led her to scrutinize the politically correct directives that steer society.
Birthplace
St. Louis, MO
Nationality
American
Location
St. Louis, MO
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Health, Family, Education, Homeschooling, Local Politics, Grassroots Activism




Conversation

Notice: Due to threatened de-monetization, we have temporarily removed commenting while we build a long-term commenting solution that allows you to voice your opinion freely and allows us to continue to publish the news fearlessly and cover topics that you care about. If you would like to personally partner with The Western Journal to help us continue publishing while under relentless assault by Big Tech, please visit our subscription page here. We encourage you to share this article and discuss with your friends.