Share
News

Report: Mexico Files Human Rights Complaint Against US Over Change in Asylum Policy

Share

Mexico and three Central American countries have filed a protest with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights regarding President Donald Trump’s new asylum policy announced earlier this month.

The Nov. 7 executive order requires migrants who are seeking asylum to present themselves lawfully at a point of entry.

Trump invoked the same authority granted to him under the Immigration and Nationality Act that he utilized in issuing his 2017 travel ban, which was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court.

The Mexican newspaper El Universal reported Monday that the ombudsmen for Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, objecting to Trump’s proclamation.

The complaint calls on the ICHR to intercede with the United States government, urging it to refrain from “collective expulsions” and guarantee “the right to request and receive asylum” for those participating in the migrant caravan, made up primarily of people from the four countries.

Trending:
Buttigieg's Port Visit Blows Up in His Face When People Notice What Was Lurking Over His Shoulder

The Washington Times reported that Homeland Security officials believe there are as many as 10,500 migrants camped along the U.S.-Mexico border seeking entry into the U.S.

“American officials say the vast majority lack legitimate asylum claims and are, instead, hoping to exploit lax U.S. policies that allow them to make their claims, then disappear into the shadows even if they aren’t worthy,” according to The Times.

Late Monday night, U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar of San Francisco barred the Trump administration from refusing asylum for those who cross the U.S. border illegally, the Associated Press reported.

“Whatever the scope of the President’s authority, he may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden,” wrote the judge, who was appointed by then-President Barack Obama in 2013.

Should the U.S. stiffen its asylum requirements?

Tigar reasoned that the “failure to comply with entry requirements such as arriving at a designated port of entry should bear little, if any, weight in the asylum process.”

The judge noted the applicable federal statute reads that those seeking asylum if they have entered the U.S. may do so “whether or not at a designated port of arrival.”

Baher Azmy, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights, which sued the Trump administration alongside the American Civil Liberties Union, argued the law “couldn’t be clearer.”

“Individuals are entitled to asylum if they cross between ports of entry,” he said.

ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt added, “We don’t condone people entering between ports of entry, but Congress has made the decision that if they do, they still need to be allowed to apply for asylum.”

Related:
Photographer Shocked After Jumping Into the Ocean and Seeing Something Had Taken a Huge Bite Into a Massive Great White

The Trump administration vowed to fight Tigar’s ruling, alluding to successfully litigating its travel ban executive order earlier this year, The Washington Post reported.

“As the Supreme Court affirmed this summer, Congress has given the President broad authority to limit or even stop the entry of aliens into this country,” the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security said in a joint statement that called the lawsuit “absurd.”

The statement added: “We look forward to continuing to defend the Executive Branch’s legitimate and well-reasoned exercise of its authority to address the crisis at our southern border.”

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 2,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Conversation

The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!