Share
Commentary

Trump WH Preps Executive Order That Could Finally Nail Zuckerberg on FB's Bias

Share

This is the best example of the proverbial rock and a hard place anyone could imagine.

Many of us who hold conservative values have alleged there is obvious bias against our voice on most social media platforms.

But what can be done to right this wrong?

Well, apparently President Donald Trump is working on it. A leaked draft of a potential executive order from the White House is floating around media outlets that attempts to bring accountability to the standard operating procedure of social media giants.

And Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg — who has been grilled repeatedly by U.S. lawmakers over the social media company’s political biases — could be one of the hardest hit because of the size of Facebook, and the difficulty he had answering accusations that his company practices a form of anti-conservative censorship when questioned by Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, among others.

Trending:
The Results of a Critical Election Recount Were Just Announced

The draft specifically refers to a social media company’s “exercise of bias” as one way it could exercise “market power in a way that harms consumers.”

While this document is a just a draft, I am hopeful at least that something can be done to curtail the what I consider to be obvious bias against conservatives on the internet.

Business Insider published excerpts of the draft order. Its focus centers on investigative authority of anti-trust violations by social media giants.

“… Because of their critical role in American society, it is essential that American citizens are protected from anticompetitive acts by dominant online platforms. Vibrant competition in the online ecosystem is essential to ensuring accountability for the platforms that hold so much sway over our economy and democratic process.”

Should the president intervene in the social media giant war on conservatives?

“Section 2. Agency Responsibilities. (a) Executive departments and agencies with authorities that could be used to enhance competition among online platforms (agencies) shall, where consistent with other laws, use those authorities to promote competition and ensure that no online platform exercises market power in a way that harms consumers, including through the exercise of bias.”

“… (b) Agencies with authority to investigate anticompetitive conduct shall thoroughly investigate whether any online platform has acted in violation of the antitrust laws, as defined in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12, or any other law intended to protect competition.”

Trump’s comments on Twitter seem to validate the complaints of conservatives that social media titans are stacking the deck against their voice.

Bloomberg reported that social media companies have acknowledged to “erroneous” targeting of figures on the both sides of the political spectrum, but have fallen short of confirming a liberal bias in their operations.

Related:
Watch: Twitter Users Notice Something Very Strange About Biden's Voice During Speech This Morning

“Social media companies have acknowledged in congressional hearings that their efforts to enforce prohibitions against online harassment have sometimes led to erroneous punishment of political figures on both the left and the right, and that once discovered, those mistakes have been corrected. They say there’s no systematic effort to silence conservative voices.”

It’s not a stretch to say that the only people who believe that are liberals.

Certainly something needs to be done where these social media moguls and heavy-handed policies against conservatives are concerned. However, all of these social media companies are private businesses and it might be a good idea to proceed cautiously when it comes to government interference in private business operation.

It’s a hard situation to navigate. The anti-trust approach could be an effective and fair way to bring justice to a situation in which conservatives have felt oppression at the hands of liberal bias.

No conservative wants the government interfering in private businesses. But if the titans of today’s social media world — very much including Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg — know that anti-trust oversight is waiting in the wings, they might be more careful about ensuring an even playing field for players from across the political spectrum.

And that doesn’t like a lot to ask.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , ,
Share
An enthusiastic grassroots Tea Party activist, Lisa Payne-Naeger has spent the better part of the last decade lobbying for educational and family issues in her state legislature, and as a keyboard warrior hoping to help along the revolution that empowers the people to retake control of their, out-of-control, government.
Lisa Payne-Naeger is passionate about all things related to influencing the configuration of our culture … family, education, politics. She’s a former school board member, turned homeschooling mom. In her quest to raise and educate her now-adult children, she has pretty much navigated every challenge and road block possible. Crusading to make the world a better place for them has led her to scrutinize the politically correct directives that steer society.
Birthplace
St. Louis, MO
Nationality
American
Location
St. Louis, MO
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Health, Family, Education, Homeschooling, Local Politics, Grassroots Activism




Conversation

The Western Journal is pleased to bring back comments to our articles! Due to threatened de-monetization by Big Tech, we had temporarily removed comments, but we have now implemented a solution to bring back the conversation that Big Tech doesn't want you to have. If you have any problems using the new commenting platform, please contact customer support at commenting-help@insticator.com. Welcome back!