Share
Commentary

Hakeem Jeffries Facing Avalanche of Trouble from His Own Party After Midterms: 'He's Got a Lot of People Mad at Him'

Share

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries could have trouble on the horizon, and it may be coming from within his own party.

At a meeting over the summer with what the Washington Times reported as “a gathering of LGBTQ activists” in Austin, Texas, Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin told the room that theirs is a “big tent” party.

“We have conservative Democrats with centrists. We’ve got progressives like me. We’ve got leftists. All are welcome in this party — all voices. But don’t tell me there’s only one way to be a Democrat. Don’t tell me there’s only one stripe to wear,” Martin remarked.

Such is the danger of Martin’s messaging. Without setting clear parameters, you’re going to get radicals, wackos, and outright embarrassing political actors being brought into the fold.

Well, Jeffries appears to be caught in the middle of this big tent. Axios shared several quotes Tuesday from his Democratic colleagues indicating that they’re less than thrilled with the job he’s doing.

A senior House Democrat anonymously told the outlet, “He’s got a lot of people mad at him.” One California Democratic candidate, Mai Vang, bluntly said, “Voters don’t trust Jeffries.”

Axios cited comments made by Jeffries as contributing to this rift.

Will House Democrats replace Hakeem Jeffries as their leader in 2027?

Last month, the minority leader told NBC’s “Meet the Press” he did not support Medicare for All. He later backpedaled a bit, saying there are “different paths” to get to universal health care coverage.

If that succeeds, it would speed the process of bankrupting the nation.

One source, the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, cited by Get Medicare Solutions, calculated that Medicare for All would cost an eye-watering $32 trillion.

In other words, Jeffries won’t outright support nearly doubling the national deficit.

Although Axios stressed that issue as looming large, others, like the United States’ support of Israel, factor in as well between leadership and a more progressive party wing.

Related:
Dems Admit They Might Sanction Moderates in Their Party Who Voted With GOP Because They're Afraid of Socialists

New York Democratic House nominee Brad Lander said, “We don’t want to send additional military aid to Israel while it continues a policy that I do believe is genocide.

“Those of us that ran on that platform, of course, will make our voices heard loud and clear in internal debates and conversations.”

Vang went further in her comments, saying, “Constituents have shared with me that House Democrats need to replace Jeffries,” adding, “That’s something I’ve heard from voters.”

Other party members commented, “Democrats nationally want to see big changes.”

Certainly, the biggest hurdle for Jeffries within his party comes from Democratic Socialists of America candidates.

The situation seems like a lose-lose.

If Democrats do well in the November midterms, it will see DSA members and other progressives arrive who would look to replace him.

Should Democrats not do well, he will take the blame and stand to be replaced anyway.

Choose The Western Journal as your preferred source on Google and never miss reporting that defends truth, protects freedom, and advances Western civilization

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Sam Short is an Assistant Professor of History with Motlow State Community College in Smyrna, Tennessee. He holds a BA in History from Middle Tennessee State University and an MA in History from University College London. The views expressed in his articles are his own and do not reflect the views or opinions of Motlow State Community College.




Share
Tags:
, , , , , , , ,

Conversation