Op-Ed: Candidate Quality Doesn't Explain the Failed Red Wave - Here's Why
Well, that didn’t take long.
Long before the votes were tallied on Tuesday night, the establishment went to work on the disappearing red wave.
Mitch McConnell’s self-serving warning that “candidate quality has a lot to do with the outcome” had long been forgotten in a wave of pollyannish polling. Once the Republican sweep failed to materialize, it was resurrected in a New York minute.
Washington Post columnist and Fox News analyst Marc Thiessen even blamed the victorious J.D. Vance in Ohio for sucking McConnell’s money out of other races. He didn’t mention that the Senate Leadership Fund had abandoned Arizona for Alaska to prop up McConnell backer Lisa Murkowski.
Regardless, the implication was clear.
These MAGA candidates underperformed and, by inference, former President Donald Trump continues to drag down the ticket. It’s a facile explanation, considering the GOP continued its gains from 2020 and will take the House and perhaps the Senate in 2022.
The anti-Trump pundits point to the gap between establishment Republican governors, like Ohio’s Mike DeWine, who cruised to victory, and the MAGA candidates who trailed behind.
But not only was Vance’s race called early, but the Trump-endorsed newcomer won by a wider-than-expected margin with over 53 percent of the vote — not that far off Rob Portman’s 56.8 percent in his first bid. As in every election, there were a few duds, like Doug Mastriano in Pennsylvania or Don Bolduc in New Hampshire, but the idea that Blake Masters, Kari Lake, Tudor Dixon and Tiffany Smiley were “bad” candidates is absurd.
Besides, comparing more parochial gubernatorial races with nationalized Senate contests in which unprecedented levels of campaign spending are far more determinative is a fool’s errand. After all, there was little daylight between Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ impressive victory and that of Sen. Marco Rubio.
But unlike some of the other failed candidates thrown under the establishment’s bus, they had the two things that Tuesday’s elections were really about, regardless of party — incumbency and money. DeSantis outraised the hapless Charlie Crist and Rubio, though outraised, amassed $45 million.
The reason the Senate Leadership Fund played heavily in places like Ohio was purely transactional. Historically, it has been one of the places where a GOP challenger can win. It shouldn’t have meant leaving other Republican candidates locked in tough races withering on the vine.
In an era dominated by outside money, the lack of support quickly becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. And no amount of candidate cold calls can come close to matching kingmakers like the Congressional Leadership Fund, which would prefer to play in safer House districts where it can rack up a better win-loss record for the next cycle.
That way, the “swamp” never loses elections — only bad candidates do. Despite the fact that it was the highly paid consultancy class that charged top dollar for errant polls (once again) and advised Republicans to keep their ammo dry, avoid controversial issues and ride a red wave that never came.
The outcome of this election cycle, like the last, was determined by early voting (now forever described as any ballots cast before a debate that includes John Fetterman) and mail-in ballots — the kind co-chairs Jimmy Carter and James Baker III cautioned against in the 2005 “Building Confidence in U.S. Elections” report.
Yet, according to those now complaining the loudest about “candidate quality,” election reform remains the issue that dare not speak its name.
Former Rep. Jason Lewis was Minnesota’s Republican nominee for the Senate in 2020 and is the author of “Party Animal: The Truth About President Trump, Power Politics & the Partisan Press.”
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of the DCNF’s original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
A version of this article appeared on the Daily Caller News Foundation website.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
