Parler Share

Pelosi Has Hostile Confrontation with Reporter, Starts Yelling 'No, No, No'

Parler Share

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would not let it go when a reporter questioned if she would be willing to pass a short-term extension to enhanced unemployment benefits while Democrats and Republicans tried to iron out their differences for the next coronavirus relief bill.

The Democrats’ plan calls for $3 trillion in new spending, matching more or less the original $2.2 trillion CARES Act plus other coronavirus legislation passed in the spring.

It includes extending the $600-per-week federal supplement in unemployment insurance through the end of January, which currently is due to expire at the end of the month.

The bill also provides for $1,200 stimulus payments to adults like those found in the CARES Act plus $1,200 payments for dependents, NPR reported.

Many have noted that a problem with the federal supplement to the state unemployment insurance benefits is that large numbers of Americans receive more staying at home than going back to work.

Watch: Farmers May Have Figured Out Exactly What's Causing the Egg Shortage - Was This Intentional?

The Democratic bill also includes nearly $1 trillion in aid to states and municipalities.

The Republican plan, the HEALS Act unveiled by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday, costs about $1 trillion and includes up to $200 per week in supplemental unemployment insurance, capping benefits at 70 percent of pre-pandemic pay, according to the New York Post.

Additionally, the GOP legislation includes $1,200 stimulus payments, plus the $500 for dependents.

Asked by a reporter if she would accept a short-term renewal in the current unemployment benefits scheme while Republicans and Democrats hashed out the $2 trillion divide between their plans, Pelosi said no — at least eight times.

Do you think the GOP plan is the better choice?

“I would be very much averse to separating this out and lose all leverage for meeting all of the other needs,” the speaker explained.

“It’s a fraudulent tactic, and with all due respect to you, an unworthy question when it comes to meeting the needs of America’s working families.

“So, they can ignore all the needs that we have for testing, all the needs we have for state and local government, all the needs we have for food security, all the needs we have for the [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] benefit that is in the bill, all the needs that we have for vote-by-mail and other priorities that we have that are about justice,” the speaker went on.

The reporter followed up, prompting Pelosi to really pounce.

“I understand all of that, but are you considering extending these benefits for a month or two while you continue to negotiate?” the reporter asked.

Is Viral Video Exposing Apparent Conspiracy at Pfizer a Trap? Something's Not Right About the Man in the Clip

Pelosi responded, “No, no, no, no.”

“Do you understand ‘no’?” she continued.

As the reporter tried to make the case that people in need could be hurt by Pelosi’s intransigence, the speaker cut her off, saying “no” and finally concluding her rant with “Pass the bill.”

What is clear the speaker is in the “never let a crisis go to waste” mode by extending the unemployment benefits through January.

We are a compassionate country navigating a very challenging time, but the role of the government is not to pay people more to stay home than to work.

There also is the little detail of the more than $26.5 trillion national debt, which has exceeded the country’s gross domestic product for the first time since World War II.

The budget deficits for this year alone could exceed $4 trillion, the largest by far in U.S. history, according to the Manhattan Institute.

If we’re going to spend more, $1 trillion is definitely better than $3 trillion at this point.

Further, the GOP plan is right in line with the traditional understanding of unemployment insurance: It helps people in times of need but makes going back to work the more financially appealing choice.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

, , , , ,
Parler Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 2,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Graduated dean's list from West Point
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith