The Right to a Jury of Our Peers Assumes We Still Live Among People Capable of Sound Judgment, Which We Don't
The foundation of the American legal system was built on a simple bedrock principle: 12 ordinary people, picked at random from the same streets as those accused of a crime, could hear evidence and collectively decide the truth.
For a long time, that foundation has held. There have been exceptions, but a jury has historically almost always done its work — and taken it as a solemn civic duty.
Now, the Sixth Amendment never assured us each a panel of engineers and rocket scientists. But it did promise a fair trial before a jury of people like us, bound by an oath, and capable of judgment that could be trusted.
Read the Rest — Subscribe Now
You've reached the end of the free preview.Join thousands who rely on us for trusted news.
Already a subscriber?
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
Truth and Accuracy
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.
