Share
Commentary

Role States Played During COVID Prepared the Country for End of Roe v. Wade

Share

The COVID-19 pandemic preceding the apparent imminent demise of Roe v. Wade seems almost providential.

For decades, more and more power has been accumulated by the federal government, but in a surprising way, states really took the lead in people’s day-to-day lives during the past couple of years.

Former President Donald Trump’s administration set the tone by recognizing that under our constitutional republic, the states possess the police powers, which encompass the health, safety and welfare of their citizens.

So when a pandemic reached the nation’s shores, the primary policy-making decisions would happen at the state level, with the federal government — which possesses only certain enumerated powers — playing a backup role.

All Americans saw how this played out with vast differences in state COVID policies in states such as New York and California versus Florida and Texas.

Trending:
Video: Horrific Bow-and-Arrow, Knife Attack Leaves 5 Dead, Proves Dem Schemes for Gun Control Don't Work

Other states fell somewhere in between with how restrictive they were in enforcing policies such as mask mandates and lockdowns.

Now abortion policy is front-and-center.

According to the leaked Supreme Court opinion draft by Justice Samuel Alito that Politico reported on Monday, the Supreme Court is poised to strike down the 1973 Roe v. Wade case that legalized abortion nationwide.

If Roe does end, state law once again would take the fore.

Do you think abortion policy should be decided at the state level?

The case the court is considering is Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization regarding a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks, i.e., four months into the pregnancy.

Other states have enacted laws that ban abortions after a heartbeat is detected in the unborn child, somewhere around five or six weeks.

And on the extreme are states such as New York and Colorado that allow late-term abortions.

The New York Times reported that 13 states have trigger laws that would ban abortions if Roe were overturned.

All of these states make exceptions to the ban if the life or health of the mother is in danger, the outlet pointed out.

Related:
Whoopi Goldberg Ignorantly Tells Archbishop It's 'Not Your Job, Dude,' to Deny Pelosi Communion

Five other states still have pre-Roe bans on the books that would come back to life.

So just as states handled the issue of COVID differently, states would handle abortion in different ways.

This is how it’s meant to be in our constitutional republic, Alito argued in his draft opinion.

“At the time of Roe, 30 states still prohibited abortion at all stages at all stages. In the years prior to that decision, about a third of the states liberalized their laws, but Roe abruptly ended the political process,” he wrote.

“It imposed the same highly restrictive regime on the entire nation, and it effectively struck down the abortion laws of every single state,” Alito added.

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” he contended.

Alito then quoted from the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), in which the originalist jurist concurred in part and dissented in part with the majority ruling.

Casey upheld the central ruling of Roe legalizing abortion nationwide but recognized that states have the power to place restrictions and regulations regarding the practice.

“The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations, upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting,” Scalia wrote.

Amen.

COVID, of course, has caused much hardship and heartache, but a silver lining is that Americans better understand our constitutional republic and the proper role states should play in deciding the law related to abortion.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 2,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Conversation