Share
News

Supreme Court Allows Pro-Life Abortion Ultrasound Law To Go Into Effect by Not Hearing Appeal

Share

The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a Kentucky law requiring doctors to show an ultrasound image of an unborn child prior to a patient undergoing an abortion.

The Associated Press reported the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the law, arguing it violating physicians’ freedom of speech rights under the First Amendment.

The ACLU of Kentucky tweeted in late September after filing its appeal petition to the Supreme Court that the law “exists only to coerce and shame patients, and has no positive health outcomes.”

The Supreme Court’s decision not to review the case leaves an April ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit — which upheld the law — in place.

In a 2-1 ruling, the circuit court found it consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision is Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which recognized the right of states to have informed consent laws.

Trending:
Trump Getting Ultimate Revenge After Raid - Eric Reports Record-Breaking Support in Just 24 Hours

The Supreme Cout held in Casey that “protecting the life of the unborn” is a “legitimate goal,” as 6th Circuit Judge John K. Bush noted in his majority opinion.

“As a First Amendment matter, there is nothing suspect with a State’s requiring a doctor, before performing an abortion, to make truthful, non-misleading factual disclosures, relevant to informed consent, even if those disclosures relate to unborn life and have the effect of persuading the patient not to have an abortion,” Bush added.

Bush was appointed to the 6th Circuit by President Donald Trump in 2017.

Judge Bernice Donald — appointed by former President Barack Obama — dissented from the majority opinion.

Do you support informed consent ultrasound laws like Kentucky's?

Donald contended the ultrasound law “is a restriction on speech that has no basis in the practice of medicine. It should be subjected to heightened scrutiny and deemed unconstitutional, lest our constitution dissolve, and tyranny be erected on its ruins.”

In a brief to the Supreme Court, lawyers for the commonwealth of Kentucky argued the law serves a vital purpose.

“Nothing can better inform a patient of the nature and consequences of an abortion than actually seeing an image of the fetus who will be aborted and receiving a medically-accurate description of that image,” the brief stated.

The pro-life group Susan B. Anthony List celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Kentucky’s ultrasound law to stay in place.

“Modern ultrasound technology opens an unprecedented window into the womb, providing undisputable evidence of the humanity of the unborn child,” SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement provided to The Western Journal.

Related:
'Woke' Florida Prosecutor Suspended for Promise Not to Enforce the Law Now Targeting DeSantis

“The abortion industry has proven incapable of policing itself and will stop at nothing to keep vulnerable women in the dark for the sake of profit, which is why state laws protecting women’s right to informed consent are so important,” she continued.

In a statement to The Western Journal, Catherine Glenn Foster, president of Americans United for Life, also hailed the “legal victory today of Kentucky’s common-sense informed consent provision simply ensuring that abortion facilities offer women who are thinking about abortion visual, ultrasound confirmation of the humanity of the life in their womb.”

The New York Times reported that the Supreme Court is slated to hear a case in March regarding a Louisiana law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

The case will mark the first major abortion issue taken up by the court since Trump’s appointment of justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Share
Randy DeSoto has written more than 2,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




Conversation