Path 27
News

Trump Lawyers Planning To Take Tax Return Fight to Supreme Court After Prosecutors Win Appeal

Path 27

President Donald Trump plans to take his legal battle with New York state prosecutors to the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal circuit court ruled on Monday that he must turn over financial records.

In August, the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance served a subpoena on behalf of a criminal grand jury it had impaneled seeking financial records, including Trump’s personal tax returns, from the president’s accounting firm, Mazars USA LLP, according to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion.

Trump’s personal attorneys sought to block the subpoena by filing a suit in federal court asking for an injunction and judgment against the document demand.

The Trump legal team argued, based on opinion memorandums issued by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, that a sitting president may not be criminally prosecuted while he or she is in office.

The issue of whether a president can be criminally prosecuted by a state or federal government has not been directly addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to Reuters.

Trending:
Olympian's Overzealous Victory Celebration Ends Up Costing Him More Than He Ever Imagined

The Constitution is silent on the matter.

A federal district court ruled against Trump in early October.

On Monday, the 2nd Circuit upheld the district court’s ruling, arguing the DOJ memorandums issued in 1973 and 2000 around the times of the impeachment inquiries against former Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton “are directed almost exclusively to the question of whether the president may be indicted,” not whether he can be criminally investigated.

“Moreover, the president concedes that his immunity lasts only so long as he holds office and that he could therefore be prosecuted after leaving office,” the judges wrote.

Do you think presidents should be subject to state criminal investigations while in office?

“There is no obvious reason why a state could not begin to investigate a president during his term and, with the information secured during that search, ultimately determine to prosecute him after he leaves office.”

The court concluded, “We hold … that any presidential immunity from state criminal process does not extend to investigative steps like the grand jury subpoena at issue here.”

Trump’s personal attorney Jay Sekulow said the ruling will be appealed, NBC News reported.

“The decision of the Second Circuit will be taken to the Supreme Court,” Sekulow said. “The issue raised in this case goes to the heart of our Republic. The constitutional issues are significant.”

Former Manhattan-based federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy charged Vance, a Democrat, with politicizing his office by targeting Trump for state criminal prosecution.

Related:
Sarah Palin Floats Big 2022 Possibility That Has Sen. Murkowski on Notice

“This is basically an obvious politicizing of state law in order to try to investigate the president for political purposes,” McCarthy told Fox News in September.

“In politics, just like in law, what goes around comes around and this is something that could bite the Democrats if a Democrat is in the White House at some later point.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James promised in December before taking office that her prosecutors would “use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family as well.”

The president tweeted about James at the time, writing that she has a “GET TRUMP agenda” and “does little else but rant, rave & politic against me.”

“Will never be treated fairly by these people – a total double standard of ‘justice.'”

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



loading

We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , ,
Path 27
Randy DeSoto has written more than 1,000 articles for The Western Journal since he joined the company in 2015. He is a graduate of West Point and Regent University School of Law. He is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths" and screenwriter of the political documentary "I Want Your Money."
Randy DeSoto is the senior staff writer for The Western Journal. He wrote and was the assistant producer of the documentary film "I Want Your Money" about the perils of Big Government, comparing the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. Randy is the author of the book "We Hold These Truths," which addresses how leaders have appealed to beliefs found in the Declaration of Independence at defining moments in our nation's history. He has been published in several political sites and newspapers.

Randy graduated from the United States Military Academy at West Point with a BS in political science and Regent University School of Law with a juris doctorate.
Birthplace
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Nationality
American
Honors/Awards
Graduated dean's list from West Point
Education
United States Military Academy at West Point, Regent University School of Law
Books Written
We Hold These Truths
Professional Memberships
Virginia and Pennsylvania state bars
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Politics, Entertainment, Faith




loading

Conversation