Share
Commentary

Feds Access iPhone with Suspect's Face Recognition

Share

The security built into Apple’s iPhone is some of the best in the mobile phone world. From high-tech encryption to personalized access options like fingerprint scanners and face recognition capability, the iPhone offers users leading security features with a trademark ease-of-use.

All those features may be for nothing, as agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation have found a way to “bypass” Face ID locks this past August.

According to an investigation by Forbes, the house of 28-year-old Grant Michalski was searched by the FBI. An agent armed with a warrant used Michalski’s own face to unlock his iPhone X.

With no hacks or tricks, the agent had the phone unlocked.

You don’t have to worry about the government forcing you to unlock your phone just yet. Although some have said Michalski is the victim of government overreach, others are quick to point out that his “forced” iPhone unlock was done as part of a child abuse investigation against him.

Trending:
'Holiday Nightmare Comes True' When Man Makes Strange Discovery in a Ravine on His Property

Emails previously exchanged between Michalski and a man he met on Craigslist detailed incest and sexual abuse against minors.

On the phone, agents discovered messages relating to the abuse of minors and even darker things. Agents say he used the message app Kik to communicate with others sharing his degenerate interests.

Michalski has now been charged with receiving and possessing child pornography.

Face ID, unlike the fingerprint unlocks on some devices, doesn’t require physical contact with the phone. A visible face is all that’s necessary to unlock it. Agents used that fact to their advantage.

Do you think this is an example of government overreach?

The technology has improved drastically since an earlier implementation caught flak over a “racist” glitch.

Specialty video equipment reveals how the technology work, and why a photograph won’t fool it.

Critics of the unlocking tactic have been speaking out against the practice.

Fred Jennings, a Tor Ekeland Law senior associate, thinks the law is simply behind the times.

Related:
Watch: Gunman Storms Altar, Pastor Seizes Back Control of God's House with One Brave Move

“The law is not well formed to provide the intuitive protections people think about when they’re using a Face ID unlock,” Jennings said of the case.

He also indicated that any challenge to the law enforcement status quo would be from someone invoking the Fifth Amendment.

Until the challenge against unlocking is made, more will likely be subject to this potentially invading practice.

Truth and Accuracy

Submit a Correction →



We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Tags:
, , , , , , , , , ,
Share
Jared has written more than 200 articles and assigned hundreds more since he joined The Western Journal in February 2017. He was an infantryman in the Arkansas and Georgia National Guard and is a husband, dad and aspiring farmer.
Jared has written more than 200 articles and assigned hundreds more since he joined The Western Journal in February 2017. He is a husband, dad, and aspiring farmer. He was an infantryman in the Arkansas and Georgia National Guard. If he's not with his wife and son, then he's either shooting guns or working on his motorcycle.
Location
Arkansas
Languages Spoken
English
Topics of Expertise
Military, firearms, history




Conversation

Notice: Due to threatened de-monetization, we have temporarily removed commenting while we build a long-term commenting solution that allows you to voice your opinion freely and allows us to continue to publish the news fearlessly and cover topics that you care about. If you would like to personally partner with The Western Journal to help us continue publishing while under relentless assault by Big Tech, please visit our subscription page here. We encourage you to share this article and discuss with your friends.